Why all children should be shot

Commentary by Peter Crotchins.

I don't care what anyone says, children should be shot. Except for children of rich people who can expect to see them go to Cambridge.

This would be a clensing for our society. The pensions crisis would slowly evaporate; there would be less litter; and people could walk the streets in safety, knowing that the ten year old muggers who set fire to old ladies and eat kittens are well and truly 10 feet under. And let's face it, this type of child is everywhere, sprouting up like wildfire.

EVIL SPAWN!

The school run - that unecssary of all wasted journies would be nulified. Just think of the money we could save on education and family tax credit! By shooting these awful chavvy lowlife scum we could also save on our taxes and make poor old people work longer - thus not starving the economy of cheap labour whilst keeping experienced workers throughout.

Yes some say this is harsh... but a cabbage wouldn't be a cabbage if it wasn't green or enjoyed by rabbits and the Chinese, now, would it? I think we understand each other.

In the same way, a bird sitting on a thatched cottage is far from a country gent, even if it is wearing a Gamekeepers hat!

Indeed. We've been getting it wrong for so long. Think of the money. The liberal left will say we're all barking mad but does a dog that barks not also fetch sticks? So we can't be all bad.

The liberal left are the problem. Not smacking their children when younger puts us in this rather odd position of mass genocide. They only have themselves to blame. If they behaved like the bear instead of the mouse, they'd know what happens to elephants in mid-day Saharan sun! Rhinos, now there's an animal, not unlike me.

By
Peter Crotchins (BSc, MSc, MDMA, CjD and MRSA).